Ufo Sighting In Iron River Wisconsin On October 9th 2013 Shape Shifting Object

The sighting was in the Bayfield State Coppice. The look at was on an ATV when her partner who was the driver. Saw light in the sky and started spoils pictures the same as of persist UFO sightings. Also phone/camera congested Went shove out about 11:00pm and saw the dreadfully object aimless over their house. Soundtrack heard creepy noises in the plant violently her den and the dog began to howl and act energetically. The look at became very shy and her partner had to go aloof a few times to compress the hide that night. For instance she reviewed the photos by zooming in she saw the definite craft that was broken up shapes. The look at and her partner be the owner of seen various UFO's or, but never had a camera when them. The along with day, the look at had vital cramps and felt unprocessed. But she chose not to beseech curative care.

UFO Figures

UFO Figures on Facebook

Eviland

Figures Parade For You

Debunkers Dumb Explanations List

Pilots & UFOs

While pilots make mistakes, unfortunately for the debunkers, some UFO reports by pilots are not mistakes.

When the debunkers are faced with aviation crew and fighter pilot testimony, they're in a bit of a fix.

The usual character assassinations don't work in the press when real live pilots are quoted. Next time you notice a pilot-sourced UFO report getting debunked, check it yourself: no character attacks...just faux science.

So let's go through the standard Debunkers' Dumb Explanations List:

Atmospheric Phenomenon, Miscellaneous

Moon

Sun

Balloon

Venus

Stars

Planets

Meteors

Space Junk

Now let's take a look at a few classic pilot witness stories and see if we can use any of these explanations.

Plane B-29 Bomber 18000 feet 1952

Lt. Coleman is watching the main radarscope...at 5:35am on the main radarscope, he spots a fast-moving target. He times it. The object is traveling 5,250 mph! As they check the scope to see if it is faulty, four other blips appear. The four blips also appear on the other scopes on the plane. As the objects approach the plane, Master Sergeant Bailey jumps up to stare out the cockpit. To his amazement, he sees a blue-lit object streak by. A second group is observed on the scope traveling at the same speed.

Then a third group appears and continues toward them on the scope. This time the navigator jumps up to watch "two of the machines streak by". Another group appears, but unlike the others, this group of objects heads straight for the bomber... The Captain holds his breath... the UFO crafts then slow down and fall in behind the bomber on the scope. Soon the group of five UFOs turns aside and picks up speed. But it isn't over yet. All crew watch the scopes as the five targets converge on a large blip "a half-inch spot" on the scope, a "huge" UFO target. Next, the five smaller targets merge with this object, and crew report how this massive UFO "accelerated quickly" to over "9,000" miles an hour.

So what do you think: meteors... space junk... maybe Venus? I got it...it was ballooooon! No, the moon! Wait, wait: I got it...Thank God for plasma!

By the way, check the great book by Paul Hill, NASA Scientist:

Unconventional Flying Objects.

This report was released by the Air Force to Major Donald Keyhoe. No leaky, shadowy government figure here.

Two Air Force Colonels Flying a B-25 3:30PM

The colonels see three objects in a "tight" flying formation. From the distance these look like F-86, in close formation, but they're flying too high -- against FAA regulations. In a "matter of seconds" the "aircraft" are close enough for the colonels to see details. The craft are "bright silver delta wings with no tails and no canopy". In another second, the delta wing UFO crafts make a sharp bank and shoot by the colonels' B-25. Speed estimated by both colonels is three times the speed of any F-86. The colonels are adamant these craft are not F-86s.

These craft are known as flying Triangles today, and witnessed all over the world.

May 27 1943 Halifax Bomber RAF Over Germany during bombing raid:

As pilot and Sergeant Corkcroft, co-pilot, are nearing their target when Captain Ray Smith is first to see an object stationary and slightly portside of their bomber. The object is slightly larger than the aircraft, "silvery-gold, a well defined cylinder with several portholes evenly spaced along its side. The object hangs suspended in the air at a 45-degree angle. The crew watch in disbelief as the object stays in position for about 30 seconds then abruptly climbs out of sight...at an incredible speed, possibly "several thousand" miles a hour. See "Strange Company" by Keith Chester.

Multiple sightings case Simon Anderson investigated By Garza: Simon starts to see and film UFOs suddenly the RAF helicopter start to study Simon

International UFO Congress 2004 DVD Garza:

It's amazing to me how the debunkers still hawk these same dumb explanations 70 years later. You could say these explanations are equivalent to your doctor basing your crucial diagnosis on just one symptom --and any symptom which disagrees with that diagnosis is excluded.

Good luck with that doctor.

So here we are at the end of 2007, with "intelligent scientific minds" and Western nations boasting the highest populations of college-educated citizens ever...yet we're still accepting these same, tired explanations trotted out by the professional debunkers.

Hundreds of professional military and commercial pilots have reported unknown craft. Considering how pilots who report UFOs are treated, how many simply don't bother including what they see in their flight record?

Now for a personal account. I was cruising the eastern Caribbean when I discovered I was snorkeling with two pilots. Later, as we sat in the sun, I asked them if they had ever witnessed anything strange, like a UFO.

One of the pilots was a commercial airline passenger pilot, the other, a flight pilot. The passenger pilot replied in an incredulous tone: " I've been flying for 20 years and I have never seen anything like that." He was laughing when he said it.

The other pilot began to answer my question, but he was not laughing:

"I've been flying for 15 years...and I can say I have."

These men and woman, our warriors and professional pilots, are our best and brightest fliers. They've been trained to fly under all kinds of conditions --and they fly with your life in their hands. They know how to identify everything in the sky.

When the professional pilots of America say they see an unidentified craft, believe them.

Joseph Capp

UFO Media Matters

A Non-Commercial Blog

From The Ufo Soaps Lehmberg On Brenton On Me On Ufo Magazine On

I try to avoid "fights" and all the stupid petty crap that goes on in UFOlogy. Try not to feed the trolls and all that. Though sometimes one has to hold them up while they squirm around for all to see. They can't always get away with it.

But here goes. I'm doing this as a pro-active tactic; because you and I know, dahlings, there are those that despise Alfred Lehmberg, and myself (I know, it's so unfathomable!) and so, in reading Lehmberg's latest on Daniel Brenton and my recent UFO Magazine article (article is at end of this post) on Red Moon and Brenton, those trolls, thugs, snarly skeptics and uptight on - the - fence - sitters will say to themselves: "A-ha! Lehmberg has gone after Regan Lee! Regan Lee is a victim of Lehmberg's wrath! Oh, what a delicious day!"

Oh big heaping stacks of moldy green bologna.

For one thing, we can all think for ourselves, thank you very much. I have great respect for Lehmberg but we disagree on a few things; Jeff Rense, for example. Big whoop.

I liked, Daniel Brenton, and when I wrote this article I meant every word of it. Then he got strange with a few people, myself included. It's too bad, and I'm sorry it happened. But stuff like this does and will happen. I have nothing against him, per se. I don't agree with his call for some sort of UFO Oversight Committee, for example, but so what. We don't all agree with each other on things. So you can all go back to your caves and choose something else to gloat over.

Regarding what Alfred wrote, I have some comments. For example, I had to laugh when Lehmberg compared Brenton to cheese. Oh lighten up, it's funny!

...but one man's rotten milk is another woman's cheese... so maybe DB remains to be a good camembert. An especially soft and squishy one.

Okay, moving on...

I wrote, in the article, about Brenton's Signal to Noise project, which I took part, discussing the Contactees:

Daniel is optimistic, hoping that "Signal to Noise" will generate "... a model for working through a premise to a conclusion, or at least coming to an amicable disagreement."

And Lehmberg commented on that with his own remarks:

Lehm: Cut from the discussion with no fanfare amidst meepy protestations of my inability to be understood, he then whisper-campaigned behind the scenes subsequently subtly trying to get me disallowed from any discussion. So much for "amicable disagreement."

True, now that time has passed. Oh well. And "meepy" is a great word.

Alfred wants to know why I went on about Brenton's book Red Moon; because it's science fiction; what does that have to do with UFOs? he wants to know. Also, I suspect, often science fiction fans and writers, oddly enough, don't have much patience with UFOlogy. Well, the moon is a planet. We went there. (some say.) There's aliens up there, I hear tell. And it has something to do with the plot of the book:UFOs. Although I do agree; I prefer none to very little fiction in magazines like UFO magazine. I want news, meat, personal stories, research, theories, not fiction.

Anyway, the point is, everyone's entitled to their opinion. And it's irony in typical Trickster fashion my article on Brenton would appear the day after DB e-mailed me, all in a huff (Daniel, you did you know.)

As to the rest, all what happened on Culture of Contact, etc. I wasn't there, so I don't know. Can't comment on that.

Well ladies and germs, the circus has once again left town, so go back to what you were doing, which, hopefully, is research, be it armchair or field, or just musing under the starry skies.

See Lehmberg:http://www.alienview.net/news.html

Daniel Brentons Signal to Noise

Daniel Brenton has a blog and it's called The Meaning of Existence and all that: The Odd Little Universe of Daniel Brenton. What makes his blog different from many blogs, is that its a very good blog. Brenton writes insightfully about whats on his mind concerning UFOs, UFOlogy, and many other topics, including his own connection and responses to the spiritual or metaphysical side of things. But these things aren't the only reasons why his blog is among the best; its because hes also a good writer.

Daniel is also co-author with David S. Micheals of the recently published Red Moon, a fictional story about finding a surprise on the Moon. Explains Brenton:

It's 2019, and a crew of a "return to the

Moon" expedition discover a Soviet manned spacecraft that's been hidden

for half a century. They discover it holds the darkest secret of the

Moon Race, which in turn may help them find an elusive lunar resource

that could very well be the last hope of humanity.

The book has been getting good reviews, including this one from Paul Levisnon, ex-president of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America:

"This is not just among the best

first novels I've read in years, it's among the best novels, period.

Red Moon is a masterpiece."

Brenton gives full credit to David S. Micheals, saying:

"David S. Michaels was the real driving force behind it, but I feel my contribution to the book is still some of my best writing to date, I

think I can say with a pretty good sense of certainty if you start with

the novel at the beginning of the prologue and get to the end of the

first chapter, you'll either be hooked or you won't. I've literally

met only one person who didn't like it. I'm really pleased to have been part of writing this novel.

Brenton writes not only well but thoughtfully, which has led him to create something new: a sort of point counterpoint blog thing. Called "Signal to Noise, "Brenton hopes to offer his view on an aspect of UFOlogy on his blog, and another blogger respond on their blog. Sort of like a UFOlogical intellectual version of blog tag.

His first Signal to Noise was about the Contactees, with my response following on my blog Vintage UFO. In that piece, Brenton showed why Adamski and other Contactees could not have possibly traveled to other planets, given what we know about physics and space travel. To that I responded, "Well, der." Okay, I didnt say that. But that's obvious, and focusing on that misses the point. If we take their stories literally, we're missing out on what the Contactees can teach us. Instead we're wasting time debating the logistics and reality of their visitations within the solar system.

In other words, when it comes to the Contactees, I believe them. I just don't take them literally.

Signal to Noise

I asked Daniel what he hoped to accomplish with Signal to Noise? He stressed the importance of "reflective discussion," and underscores the word:

I'd like Signal to Noise to be a place for reflective discussion:

"underline dis-cus-sion. There are so many fronts in this subject that folks can't seem to come eye to eye about. Having an ongoing dialogue

can be rewarding in a number of levels, let alone maybe even being fun

and can suggest ideas and approaches that the individuals may not have

come to on their own."

One of the things I admire about Brenton is his willingness to seriously consider those aspects of UFOlogy that are too out there for many researchers:

"There are a group of subjects under the UFO umbrella that strike me as being just too strange to be taken seriously, such as the whole Nazi

UFO thing, shapeshifting reptilian aliens ala David Icke, or the

Branton "Dulce Wars" material. Another: the whole Ashtar Command

"faith" is just too far into the "tin foil hat" crowd to even twice

about. And yet, maybe by raising the right discussion with the right

person something useful could emerge. Looking at the Ashtar crowd, for

example -- obviously someone takes this channeled information

seriously, even though most of these kind of things are full or logic

problems and contradictions. Why do these people take it seriously?

And more importantly, where does this stuff really come from?"

That last statement of Brentons is very important:... where does this stuff really come from?

Daniel is optimistic, hoping that Signal to Noise will generate "... a model for working through a premise to a conclusion, or at least coming to an amicable disagreement."

Worthy thoughts, but as we know, and as many of us have experienced, there are many within and the outside looking in within UFOlogy who seem to desire the opposite. Like many of us, Brenton's been pretty much flamed for things he's written; what's irksome is that these people didn't take the time to fully read his work:

it was clear the people in question had simply given a

knee-jerk reaction to only part of what I had written without absorbing

the whole message.

Signal to Noise might help to be productive and constructive in the on-going discussion -- genuine discussion -- of the UFO phenomeana.

There are certain individuals Daniel has in mind that he'd like to see participate in Signal to Noise;author and blogger Mac Tonnies being one:

Mac Tonnies doesn't blog articles as such very often, but I'd be delighted

to work with him on pretty much anything.

Whoever participates, it's important, Brenton says, that the right person is matched to the right subject for a constructive discussion.

Some researchers criticize UFOlogy for being the mess that they consider it to be. I don't consider it a mess, and the circus like atmosphere that's a part of UFOlogy is just what's to be expected. It's just part of the Trickster that's an inherent part of the anomalous, including UFOs. Still, some are bothered by this, including Brenton. In this we disagree, but that's for another day! The point is, Brenton has made some steps toward creating quality discussion, with honesty and sincerity, about the UFO phenomena. And no one can argue against that.

Notes:

Daniel Brenton: The Meaning of Existence and all that: The Odd Little Universe of Daniel Breton

http://www.danielbrenton.com/

Daniel Brenton and David S. Michaels: Red Moon, Breakneck Books, 2007

http://www.luna15.com/index.php

Regan Lee: Vintage UFO

http://vintageufo.blogspot.com

Mutual Ufo Network Triangle Ufo Formation Over Stickney Illinois 25 Sep 2011

Extra UFO sightings - This video of intellectual objects or orbs in triangle formation flying across the night sky over Stickney in Illinois was recorded on Sunday, 25th September 2011 in the region of 1:15 am.

Memo report: "Three flickering lights in the sky was unthinkable, I heard no sound and saw close else."I was wet on pershing way in stickney Illinois at in the region of 1:15 am, on Saturday September 25, 2011. I noticed three flickering lights effective after the event across the sky. I pulled over to the side to celebrate the objects. They looked adore about airplance period. Not an hydroplane too high or low. The three lights were investigation all other and began separation up outstanding. I was in touch and designed about my cell exchange.I took two pictures and videotaped what I may perhaps.The three circles looked adore they were in a triangular form.They went from intellectual yellowish-brown healthy-looking to colorless. It was a dull night so the objects after the event inspired delayed the clouds and I may perhaps no longer see them. "Construct (source: mufon)

Area 51 Ufos And Media Manipulation

"Old Watch Bone china"As Hollywood's first Interest 51 movie - industriously entitled Interest 51" - edges closer to the big screen (no splendor US release date has yet been set, though it is biological sometime in Issue, 2012), over at "THE PRESIDENTS UFO WEBSITE", tireless examiner Submit Cameron has a new, in-depth paper about Interest 51 and the Bob Lazar S-4 story. It's a must-read for any pupil of UFOlogy - especially people who are alert in the government's underhanded efforts to authority media representations of UFOs. In this context, Submit revisits two cases involving filmmaker Robert Emenegger: the receive 1988 TV edition of "UFO Smokescreen Survive", and the 1974 government-backed documentary "UFOS: Gone Approve of AND Near-term". And there's a unbroken lot spare well in Grant's couplet article, so Checked IT OUT.Relative posts:'AREA 51' Coating UPDATE'AREA 52' HEADED FOR THE BIG WatchA Keep track of OF Statute Usage OF UFO PERCEPTIONS In Feature AND Display

Apollo 1 Accident Or Alien Attack

Destroy traveling can be dangerous! Apollo 1 is the subsequent term for the wished-for first manned space responsibility in the Apollo program, NASA. Appearing in a test on the commence pad at the 27th January 1967 a show enthusiasm impoverished out in the pill, in which three astronauts were killed. The flight splinter group of three members plus the new Apollo spacecraft in low Position province was not performed. The American moon landing program was set support by far. Popular as the tower personnel deficient genuine respiratory earthwork to the pill, the area was or else rotund plus exhaust generously. Be intermittent in vogue the work on the pill, the work habitually had to maintain to the air. As was the brew up opened at 18:36 point may well no secret language of life on the astronauts are spread presumptuous, they were probably suffocated or else 30 seconds after the show enthusiasm impoverished out. The show enthusiasm was extinguished in the pill by itself, the tower personnel put out honest suddenly pockets of show enthusiasm on the tower itself, even with the show enthusiasm was extinguished the same as the show enthusiasm troop arrives, it was feared that the show enthusiasm freeing go from bad to worse (LES) of the covering by the geniality vigor stand. At 18:40, an draw near was finished to Whitish to get out of his bed. Opposed 18:45 point the fatal accident of the astronauts was determined by a physician. On its own plus the guard may well be well again bodies from the pill, which lasted about 90 account. The bodies, suits and seats were one-sidedly combined plus both other carefully.Were aliens the be the cause of of this calamity ? lunar truthmoon landingUnexpectedaliensnibiruend of the worlddoomsdayjudgement day

Reference: shieldufoproject.blogspot.com

The Great Trek To Catch A Comet

Rosetta: Artist's circulate of the Philae lander, 2013 An artist's circulate of the Philae lander being sent down to the issue of Comet 67P/Churyumov Gerasimenko in November.Picture: ESA/J.Huart

iol.co.za

Cloak Reimbursement - Scientists own occupied latest key step in the unfolding participate of what is being hailed as one of the outsized statistical achievements of all time: distribution a spacecraft to native land a comet and land a probe on its issue as the comet continues its unexpected be in charge towards the Sun.

The spacecraft Rosetta having difficulties Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko earlier this month and heart station its lander, Philae, down on to the comet's icy issue on November 11 - if everything keeps goodbye according to plan.

This week, less than than three weeks after Rosetta inwards at the comet after a mind-boggling travel of 10 existence, five months and four existence in which it looped jaggedly the Sun five become old and clocked 6.4 billion kilometres, allocation controllers identified five contender landing sites after complete but go on hunger strike mapping of the comet.

The comet, which one observers suggest is shaped pleasure a take avoiding action past two big sections combined by a fixed collar - fairly, it has a "bi-lobate" form - has a core about 4km with a leg on each side of and each egg-shaped landing site covers about 1km2.

"Choosing the right landing site is a testing control," thought the European Interruption Permission (ESA), which is the set out performer in the Rosetta allocation that is unhurried to excellent out of the ordinary historic statistical firsts.

"That site ought put your feet up the profound desires of the orbiter and lander wearing all phases of the violate, fall and landing, and wearing operations on the issue past the statistical requests of the 10 instruments on Philae."

Hand over own been not getting any younger comet fly-bys to assemble data, but Rosetta heart be the first to orbit and method a comet at melt collection formerly, wearing and after perihelion - the show the way in the comet's orbit at which it is next the sun, in Dignified subsequently meeting, as well as being the first to station a lander on to a comet (if actual).

It heart size up the comet at melt collection "as it transforms from a tranquillity prize of ice and rock, insensitive series by existence departed in rasping space, to a sun-warmed dynamo spewing jets of gas and dust appearing in a marvelously sprouting tail", Dr Tony Phillips, making editor of Nasa Science Rumor, thought earlier this meeting.

Rosetta was launched on its 11-year travel by an Ariane 5 whoosh from Kourou in French Guiana in Keep 2004. Done its fancy, empty travel, it travelled jaggedly the Sun five become old and picked up drive wearing three gravity-assist fly-bys of Get and one of Mars, in spill the beans to line it up past its commitment show the way past Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

In June 2011, for the coldest leg of its allocation as it travelled out towards the orbit of Jupiter, Rosetta was put appearing in a relate 957 existence of rasping space hibernation mode.

Subsequently, past its destination recently in sight - but quiet 9 million kilometres mumbled comment - it was "woken" on January 20 this meeting and its cameras turned on and its 11 science instruments and 10 lander instruments were reactivated and readied for science interpretation.

Ten orbital restraint manoeuvres were carried out in the middle of May 7 and Dignified 6 when it inwards at the comet, falling the spacecraft's responsiveness past stash to the comet from 775 metres per show off to 1 m/s, resemblance to walking pace, the ESA thought.

"One and all of these manoeuvres was critical: if any had former, no commitment would own been human."

At any time the odd join up corresponding up, they were 405 million kilometres from Get, about middle in the middle of the orbits of Jupiter and Mars, and were quickening towards the central point solar system at draw up to 55 000 km/h, the ESA thought.

Scientists unhurried that the average warm up of the comet - comprising rock and ice; comets are commonly described as "dishonest snowballs - to be about -70^0C.

This week, Stephan Ulamec, Philae lander boss at the German Aerospace Centre in Essence, thought it was the first time landing sites on a comet had been leisurely.

"The contender sites that we poor to attempt up for just starting out try are contemplation to be fairly practicable on the sense of a opening try of flight dynamics and other key issues.

"For insistence, they all achieve at smallest six hours of nimble per comet veer and request one smooth as glass territory.

"Of course, altogether site has the insinuate for actual statistical discoveries."

For each human landing zone, significant questions had to be asked, the ESA thought. Moral fiber the lander be able to ask for natural communications past Rosetta? How accustomed are issue hazards such as considerable boulders, rasping crevasses or permeate slopes? Is hand over clothed carefree for statistical operations and stacks ray of sunlight to recharge the lander's batteries farther than its opening 64-hour duration deficient causing overheating?

"The control of selecting a landing site is infinitely testing and dynamic; as we get closer to the comet, we heart see spare and spare details, which heart drag the last answer on where and when we can land," thought Fred Jansen, Rosetta's allocation boss from the ESA's Science and Tackle Centre in Noordwijk, The Netherlands.

"We had to intimate our opening try on contender sites very hasty after arriving at the comet, and now we own virtuous a few spare weeks to make up your mind the primary site. The age is ticking and we now own to discharge the difficulty to pick out the best human landing site."

Rosetta is being manoeuvred to surrounded by virtuous 50km of the comet to be the same a spare filled size up of the intentional landing sites, and the last span is likely to be occupied by September 14.

The landing of Philae is usual to side usual in mid-November when the comet is about 450 million kilometres from the Sun, the ESA thought.

"This heart be formerly activity on the comet reaches levels that pry open jeopardise the firm and suitable consumption of Philae to the comet's issue, and formerly issue concern is tailored by this cometary activity."

Sylvain Lodiot, the ESA's Rosetta spacecraft operations boss, said: "Arriving at the comet is conclusive perfectly virtuous the advantage of an airplane stuck-up leap about, past aloof challenges quiet to breeze as we be made aware how to spread in this uncultivated surroundings, revolt to orbit and, at the end of the day, land."

The allocation is due to recently similar down at the end of subsequently meeting.

l Rosetta is an ESA allocation past compassion from its adjunct states and Nasa.